| |
|
|
|
|
| Category |
|
|
 [27]
|
|
|
 [0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 2024.4 
|
|
|
|
|
일 |
월 |
화 |
수 |
목 |
금 |
토 |
| | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 산학협력 |
|
| 제 목 |
Network, Channel, and Geographical Proximity of Knowledge Transfer - The Case of University-Industry Collaboration in South Korea |
조회 |
1,410 |
|
| 작성자 |
권기석의 홈페이지 님께서 2016-05-31 에 작성하셨습니다. |
|
| 첨부파일 |
 242_262_Kwon_20150829.pdf (Download:439회)
|
|
| 전화번호 |
☏ 042-821-1786 |
|
The relationship between geographical proximity and academics’ formal and informal knowledge-transfer activities in the network is analyzed with a mixed research method. With social network analysis as a basis, we have explored the networks between academics and firms in the 16 regions of South Korea. The result shows Seoul and Gyunggi are identified as central nodes, meaning that the academics in other regions tend to collaborate with firms in these regions. An econometric analysis is performed to confirm the localization of knowledge-transfer activities. The intensity of formal channels measured by the number of academic papers is negatively, but significantly associated with the geographical proximity. This result is meaningfully opposite of the findings of previous studies. However, we have not found any significant relationship between the formality of the channels and geographical proximity. A possible explanation is that a highly-qualified collaboration tends to overcome geographical barriers, since academics put more weights in papers than patents. The regional innovation systems in South Korea are neither big enough nor strong enough to show a localization effect.
Kwon, K.-S. et al. (2015), Network, Channel, and Geographical Proximity of Knowledge Transfer: The Case of University-Industry Collaboration in South Korea, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 4(2), pp. 242-262.
|
|
|
| | | |
